Let us write the definition of rational numbers and also write 4 rational numbers.
A number which can be expressed in form of ,
Where p and q are integers and q≠0
[Extra note
Rational numbers include whole numbers, natural numbers, and integers.
In Decimal values either they are terminating or non-terminating and repeating]
Four rational numbers are
Is 0 a rational number? Let us express 0 in the form of p/q [Where p & q are integers and q ≠ 0 and p & q have no common factor other than 1].
Yes 0 is a rational number
As rational numbers are number which can be expressed in form of ,
Where p and q are integers and q≠0
⇒ 0 divides and multiply by any number gives 0
As 0 has infinite number of factors
Here, p & q are integers and q ≠ 0 and p & q have no common factor other than 1
Let me place the following rational numbers on Number Line:
(i) 7, (ii) –4, (iii) , (iv) , (v) , (vi) , (vii)
(i) Draw the number line
Place 7 on it
(ii) Draw the number line
Place -4 on it
(iii) Draw the number line
As lies on 0 and 1
Draw number line of 0 to 1 having in between
(iv) Draw the number line
As lies on 4 and 5
Draw number line of 0 to 5 having in between
(v) Draw the number line
As lies on 0 and 1
Draw number line of 0 to 1 having in between
(vi) Draw the number line
As lies on 2 and 3
Draw number line of 0 to 3 having in between
(vii) Draw the number line
As lies on 0 and 1
Draw number line of 0 to 1 having in between
Let me write one rational number lying between two numbers given below and place them on Number Line.
4 & 5
Formula used.
If 2 rational number X and Y
Then, is a rational number lying between X and Y
Solution.
X = 4 and Y = 5
Then number lying between 2 number is
=
Let me write one rational number lying between two numbers given below and place them on Number Line.
1 & 2
Formula used.
If 2 rational number X and Y
Then, is a rational number lying between X and Y
X = 1 and Y = 2
Then number lying between 2 number is
=
Let me write one rational number lying between two numbers given below and place them on Number Line.
Formula used.
If 2 rational number X and Y
Then, is a rational number lying between X and Y
X = and Y =
Then number lying between 2 number is
= =
Let me write one rational number lying between two numbers given below and place them on Number Line.
Formula used.
If 2 rational number X and Y
Then, is a rational number lying between X and Y
X = -1 and Y =
Then number lying between 2 number is
= =
Let me write one rational number lying between two numbers given below and place them on Number Line.
Formula used.
If 2 rational number X and Y
Then, is a rational number lying between X and Y
X = and Y =
Then number lying between 2 number is
= =
Let me write one rational number lying between two numbers given below and place them on Number Line.
–2 & –1.
Formula used.
If 2 rational number X and Y
Then, is a rational number lying between X and Y
X = -2 and Y = -1
Then number lying between 2 number is
=
Let me write 3 rational numbers lying between 4 & 5 and place them on Number Line.
Formula used.
If X and Y are 2 rational numbers and X<Y then n rational numbers can be taken on line between X and Y
(X+d),(X+2d),(X+3d)……,(X+nd)
Where d =
X = 4 and Y = 5
n = 3;
d = =
Then the 3 numbers are,
(4+) , (4+2×) , (4+3×)
Let me write 6 rational numbers lying between 1 & 2 and place them on Number Line.
Formula used.
If X and Y are 2 rational numbers and X<Y then n rational numbers can be taken on line between X and Y
(X+d),(X+2d),(X+3d)……,(X+nd)
Where d =
X = 1 and Y = 2
n = 6;
d = =
Then the 6 numbers are,
(1+) , (1+2×) , (1+3×) , (1+4×) , (1+5×) , (1+6×)
Let me write 3 rational numbers lying between
Formula used.
If X and Y are 2 rational numbers and X<Y then n rational numbers can be taken on line between X and Y
(X+d),(X+2d),(X+3d)……,(X+nd)
Where d =
X = and Y =
n = 3;
d = =
Then the 3 numbers are,
(+) , (+2×) , (+3×)
Let me put (T) if the statement is true and write (F) if the statement is wrong.
(i) By adding, subtracting and multiplying two integers, we get integers.
(ii) By dividing two integers, we always get an integer.
(i) True
Let’s get it by example
Take 2 integers suppose 2 and 3
On adding
We get 2+3 = 5
Which is an integer
On subtracting
We get 2-3 = -1
Which is an integer
On multiplying
We get 2×3 = 6
Which is an integer
∴ On adding, subtracting and multiplying two integers, we get integer
(ii) False
Let’s get it by example
Take 2 integer suppose 2 and 5
On dividing
We get = 0.4
Which is not an integer;
Let me see and write what I will get by adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing (divisor is non-zero) two rational numbers.
As rational numbers are number which can be expressed in form of ,
Where p and q are integers and q≠0
Let’s take 2 rational number and
On adding 2 rational numbers.
Where result is in form of
As multiplying and adding integers gives an integer
(ys) can’t be 0 because y,s≠0
∴ Adding 2 rational number gives a rational number
On subtracting 2 rational numbers.
Where result is in form of
As multiplying and subtracting integers gives an integer
(ys) can’t be 0 because y,s≠0
∴ Subtracting 2 rational number gives a rational number
On multiplying 2 rational numbers.
Where result is in form of
As multiplying an integers gives an integer
(ys) can’t be 0 because y,s≠0
∴ Multiplying 2 rational number gives a rational number
On Dividing 2 rational numbers.
Where result is in form of
As multiplying an integer gives an integer
(yr) can be 0 because r can be 0
∴ Dividing 2 rational number doesn’t gives a rational number
Let us write the right or False statement from the following:
(i) The sum of two rational numbers will always be rational.
(ii) The sum of two irrational numbers will always be irrational.
(iii) The product of two rational numbers will always be rational.
(iv) The product of two irrational numbers will always be rational.
(v) Each rational number must be real.
(vi) Each real number must be irrational.
(i) True
We can explain this with an example.
Let the two rational numbers be and .
On addition, which is also a rational number.
(ii) True
We can explain this with an example.
Let the two irrational numbers be √2 and √3
On addition, √2+√3, which is also an irrational number.
(iii) True
Explanation: We can explain this with an example.
Let the two rational numbers be and .
On addition, which is also a rational number.
(iv) False
We can explain this with an example.
Let the two irrational numbers be √3 and √5
On multiplication, √3 × √5 = √15,
which is an irrational number. So, this is not always true.
(v) True
Since a rational number can be plotted on a number line, therefore, every rational number is a real number.
(vi) False
This can be explained with an example. Let us consider any real number, say 2, 2 is a real number as it can be plotted on a number line.
We can write 2 as , so 2 is a rational number.
∴ The given statement is not always true.
What is meant by irrational numbers? —let me understand. Let me write 4 irrational numbers.
The numbers which cannot be expressed in the form of , where q is not equal to zero are called Irrational Numbers.
√2, since its value 1.414… we cannot write the exact value of √2 and thereby cannot write it in form, as a result it is an irrational number.
Four irrational numbers are: √3, √5, √6 and √7
Let us write rational and irrational numbers from the following:
(i) √9 (ii) √225
(iii) √7 (iv) √50
(v) √100 (vi) -√81
(vii) √42 (viii) √29
(ix) -√1000
(i) As we know 9 is a square of 3,
⇒ √9 = 3, which is rational
∴ √9 is a rational number.
(ii) As we know 225 is a square of 15,
⇒ √225 = 15, which is a rational number
∴ √225 is a rational number.
(iii) As value of √7 cannot be written exactly and thereby cannot be written in form, √7 is an irrational number.
(iv) We can write,
√50 = 5√2
As value of √2 cannot be written exactly and thereby cannot be written in form, √2 is an irrational number.
∴ √50 is an irrational number.
(v) As we know 100 is a square of 10,
⇒ √100 = 10, which is a rational number
∴ √100 is a rational number.
(vi) As we know 81 is a square of 9,
⇒ -√100 = -9 , which is a rational number
∴ -√81 is a rational number.
(vii) As value of √42 cannot be written exactly and thereby cannot be written in form, √42 is an irrational number.
(viii) As value of √29 cannot be written exactly and thereby cannot be written in form, √29 is an irrational number.
(ix) We can write,
-√1000 = -10√10
As value of √10 cannot be written exactly and thereby cannot be written in form, √10 is an irrational number.
∴ -√1000 is an irrational number.
Let me place on Number Line.
Let the point O represent 0 on the number line.
We place a point A on the number line such that OA = 2 units.
Now, we draw AB perpendicular to OA at point A such that AB = 1unit.
By Pythagoras’ Theorem, we know that,
OB2 = OA2 + AB2
⇒ OB2 = 4 + 1 = 5
⇒ OB = √5
Now, taking O as a centre and OB as the radius, an arc is drawn which intersects the number line at P.
∴ OP = √5 units
Hence, Point P represents √5
Let the point O represent 0 on the number line.
We place a point A on the number line such that OA = 1 units.
Now, we draw AB perpendicular to OA at point A such that AB = 1unit.
By Pythagoras’ Theorem, we know that,
OB2 = OA2 + AB2
⇒ OB2 = 1 + 1 = 2
⇒ OB = √2
Now, we draw BC perpendicular to OB at point B such that BC = 1unit.
Again, by Pythagoras’ Theorem, we know that,
OC2 = OB2 + BC2
⇒ OC2 = 2 + 1 = 3
⇒ OC = √3
Now, taking O as a centre and OC as the radius, an arc is drawn which intersects the number line at P.
∴ OP = √3 units
Hence, Point P represents √3
Let me place √5, √6, √7, -√6, -√8, -√11 on same Number Line.
Let the point O represent 0 on the number line.
We place a point A on the number line such that OA = 2 units.
Now, we draw AB perpendicular to OA at point A such that AB = 1unit.
By Pythagoras’ Theorem, we know that,
OB2 = OA2 + AB2
⇒ OB2 = 4 + 1 = 5
⇒ OB = √5
Now, we draw BC perpendicular to OB at point B such that BC = 1unit.
Again, by Pythagoras’ Theorem, we know that,
OC2 = OB2 + BC2
⇒ OC2 = 5 + 1 = 6
⇒ OC = √6
We draw CD perpendicular to OC at point C such that CD = 1unit.
Again, by Pythagoras’ Theorem, OD = √7
Again, we draw ED perpendicular to OD at point D such that ED = 1unit.
Again, by Pythagoras’ Theorem, OE = √8
If we extend ED till F such that EF = 2 units and applying Pythagoras’ theorem on ΔODF, we get OF = √11
Now, taking O as a centre and OB, OC, OD, OE and OF as the radius, the arcs are drawn which intersects the number line at G, H, I, K and L.
∴ OG = √5 units, OH = √6 units, OI = √7 units, OJ = -√6 units, OK = -√8 units and OL = -√11 units